*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
Summary:
CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName was not correctly parsing templated functions whose demangled name
included the return type -- the space before the function name was included in the "context" and
the context itself was not terminated correctly due to a misuse of the substr function (second
argument is length, not the end position). Fix that and add a regression test.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23608
llvm-svn: 279038
- if a synthetic child comes from the same hierarchy as its parent object, then it can't be cached by SharedPointer inside the synthetic provider, or it will cause a reference loop;
- but, if a synthetic child is made from whole cloth (e.g. from an expression, a memory region, ...), then it better be cached by SharedPointer, or it will be cleared out and cause an assert() to fail if used at a later point
For most cases of self-rooted synthetic children, we have a flag we set "IsSyntheticChildrenGenerated", but we were not using it to track caching. So, what ended up happening is each provider would set up its own cache, and if it got it wrong, a hard to diagnose crash would ensue
This patch fixes that by centralizing caching in ValueObjectSynthetic - if a provider returns a self-rooted child (as per the flag), then it gets cached centrally by the ValueObject itself
This cache is used only for lifetime management and not later retrieval of child values - a different cache handles that (because we might have a mix of self-rooted and properly nested child values for the same parent, we can't trivially use this lifetime cache for retrieval)
Fixes rdar://26480007
llvm-svn: 274683
The libc++ shipped with the android NDK is shipped using a different
internal namespace then the upstream libc++ (__ndk1 vs. __1) to avoid
an ODR violation between the platform and the user application. This
change fixes our pretty printers to be able to work with the types
from the android NDK libc++.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21680
llvm-svn: 274489
Also added a data formatter that presents them as structs if you use frame
variable to look at their contents. Now the blocks testcase works.
<rdar://problem/15984431>
llvm-svn: 268307
This patch fixes a bunch of issues that show up on big-endian systems:
- The gnu_libstdcpp.py script doesn't follow the way libstdc++ encodes
bit vectors: it should identify the enclosing *word* and then access
the appropriate bit within that word. Instead, the script simply
operates on bytes. This gives the same result on little-endian
systems, but not on big-endian.
- lldb_private::formatters::WCharSummaryProvider always assumes wchar_t
is UTF16, even though it could also be UTF8 or UTF32. This is mostly
not an issue on little-endian systems, but immediately fails on BE.
Fixed by checking the size of wchar_t like WCharStringSummaryProvider
already does.
- ClangASTContext::GetChildCompilerTypeAtIndex uses uint32_t to access
the virtual base offset stored in the vtable, even though the size
of this field matches the target pointer size according to the C++
ABI. Again, this is mostly not visible on LE, but fails on BE.
- Process::ReadStringFromMemory uses strncmp to search for a terminator
consisting of multiple zero bytes. This doesn't work since strncmp
will stop already at the first zero byte. Use memcmp instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18983
llvm-svn: 266313
(lldb) b ~Foo
(lldb) b Foo::~Foo
(lldb) b Bar::Foo::~Foo
Improved out C++ breakpoint locations tests as well to cover this issue.
<rdar://problem/25577252>
llvm-svn: 266139
On libc++ std::atomic is a fairly simple data type (layout wise, at least), wrapping actual contents in a member variable named "__a_"
All the formatters are doing is "peel away" this intermediate layer and exposing user data as direct children or values of the std::atomic root variable
Fixes rdar://24329405
llvm-svn: 260752
Summary:
This change is relevant for inferiors compiled with GCC. GCC does not
emit complete debug info for std::basic_string<...>, and consequently, Clang
(the LLDB compiler) does not generate correct mangled names for certain
functions.
This change removes the hard-coded alternate names in
ItaniumABILanguageRuntime.cpp.
Before the hard-coded names were put in ItaniumABILanguageRuntime.cpp, one could
not evaluate std::string methods (ex. std::string::length). After putting in
the hard-coded names, one could evaluate them. However, it did not still
enable one to call methods on, say for example, std::vector<string>.
This change makes that possible.
There is some amount of incompleteness in this change. Consider the
following example:
std::string hello("hello"), world("world");
std::map<std::string, std::string> m;
m[hello] = world;
One can still not evaluate the expression "m[hello]" in LLDB. Will
address this issue in another pass.
Reviewers: jingham, vharron, evgeny777, spyffe, dawn
Subscribers: clayborg, dawn, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12809
llvm-svn: 257113
This brings the timings down for 1500 elements from 166 to 2 seconds on my machine - if I can math correctly, that is a 98% improvement
llvm-svn: 254781
If memory turns out to be a problem, which I don't think it will in practice because all these ValueObjects, we'd be keeping alive anyway, I can always resort to caching the farthest-most iterator only
This gains us an order of magnitude in my benchmark, cutting the time to traverse a 1500-elements list from 22 seconds down to 2
llvm-svn: 254762
* Remove an unneccessary re-computaion on arch spec from the ELF file
* Use a local cache to optimize name based section lookups in symtab
parsing
* Optimize C++ method basename validation with replacing a regex with
hand written code
These modifications reduce the time required to parse the symtab from
large applications by ~25% (tested with LLDB as inferior)
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14088
llvm-svn: 251402
Summary:
Loop detection code is being called before every element access. Although it tries to cache some
of the data by remembering the loop-free initial segment, every time it needs to increase this
segment, it will start from scratch. For the typical usage pattern, where one accesses the
elements in order, the loop detection will need to be run after every access, resulting in
quadratic behavior. This behavior is noticable even for the default 255 element limit.
In this commit, I rewrite the algorithm to be truly incremental -- it maintains the state of its
loop-detection runners between calls, and reuses them when it needs to check another segment.
This way, each part of the list is scanned only once, resulting in linear behavior.
Also note that I have changed the operator== of ListEntry to do the comparison based on the
value() function (instead of relying on ValueObjectSP equality). In my experiments, I kept
getting different ValueObjectSPs when going through the same element twice.
Reviewers: granata.enrico
Subscribers: lldb-commits, sivachandra
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13902
llvm-svn: 250890
Summary:
This doesn't exist in other LLVM projects any longer and doesn't
do anything.
Reviewers: chaoren, labath
Subscribers: emaste, tberghammer, lldb-commits, danalbert
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12586
llvm-svn: 246749
The Language plugin is menat to answer language-specific questions that are not bound to the existence of a process. Those are still the domain of the LanguageRuntime plugin
The Language plugin will, instead, answer questions such as providing language-specific data formatters or expression evaluation
At the moment, the interface is hollowed out, and empty do-nothing plugins have been setup for ObjC, C++ and ObjC++
llvm-svn: 246212
Kate Stone