When constructing a ParsedAttr the ParsedAttrInfo gets looked up in the
AttrInfoMap, which is auto-generated using tablegen. If that lookup fails then
we look through the ParsedAttrInfos that plugins have added to the registry and
check if any has a spelling that matches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31338
is ambiguous, but only one of the possible lookup results could possibly
be right.
Clang recently started diagnosing ambiguity in more cases, and this
broke the build of Firefox. GCC, ICC, MSVC, and previous versions of
Clang all accept some forms of ambiguity here (albeit different ones in
each case); this patch mostly accepts anything any of those compilers
accept.
This doesn't do anything on its own, but it's the first step towards
allowing plugins to define attributes. It does simplify the
ParsedAttrInfo generation in ClangAttrEmitter a little though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31337
Add atomic types and builtins operating on those atomic types to
`-fdeclare-opencl-builtins`. The _explicit variants are left out of
this commit, as these take enum arguments that are not yet supported
by the `-fdeclare-opencl-builtins` machinery.
Summary:
Right now we annotate C++'s `operator new` with `noalias` attribute,
which very much is healthy for optimizations.
However as per [[ http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.stc.dynamic.allocation | `[basic.stc.dynamic.allocation]` ]],
there are more promises on global `operator new`, namely:
* non-`std::nothrow_t` `operator new` *never* returns `nullptr`
* If `std::align_val_t align` parameter is taken, the pointer will also be `align`-aligned
* ~~global `operator new`-returned pointer is `__STDCPP_DEFAULT_NEW_ALIGNMENT__`-aligned ~~ It's more caveated than that.
Supplying this information may not cause immediate landslide effects
on any specific benchmarks, but it for sure will be healthy for optimizer
in the sense that the IR will better reflect the guarantees provided in the source code.
The caveat is `-fno-assume-sane-operator-new`, which currently prevents emitting `noalias`
attribute, and is automatically passed by Sanitizers ([[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16386 | PR16386 ]]) - should it also cover these attributes?
The problem is that the flag is back-end-specific, as seen in `test/Modules/explicit-build-flags.cpp`.
But while it is okay to add `noalias` metadata in backend, we really should be adding at least
the alignment metadata to the AST, since that allows us to perform sema checks on it.
Reviewers: erichkeane, rjmccall, jdoerfert, eugenis, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: xbolva00, jrtc27, atanasyan, nlopes, cfe-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73380
Summary:
There was even a TODO for this.
The main motivation is to make use of call-site based
`__attribute__((alloc_align(param_idx)))` validation (D72996).
Reviewers: rsmith, erichkeane, aaron.ballman, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73020
Verifies that an argument passed to __builtin_frame_address or __builtin_return_address is within the range [0, 0xFFFF]
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66839
Re-committed after fixed: c93112dc4f
Compute and propagate conversion kind to diagnostics helper in C++
to provide more specific diagnostics about incorrect implicit
conversions in assignments, initializations, params, etc...
Duplicated some diagnostics as errors because C++ is more strict.
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74116
Summary:
Clang's "asm goto" feature didn't initially support outputs constraints. That
was the same behavior as gcc's implementation. The decision by gcc not to
support outputs was based on a restriction in their IR regarding terminators.
LLVM doesn't restrict terminators from returning values (e.g. 'invoke'), so
it made sense to support this feature.
Output values are valid only on the 'fallthrough' path. If an output value's used
on an indirect branch, then it's 'poisoned'.
In theory, outputs *could* be valid on the 'indirect' paths, but it's very
difficult to guarantee that the original semantics would be retained. E.g.
because indirect labels could be used as data, we wouldn't be able to split
critical edges in situations where two 'callbr' instructions have the same
indirect label, because the indirect branch's destination would no longer be
the same.
Reviewers: jyknight, nickdesaulniers, hfinkel
Reviewed By: jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: MaskRay, rsmith, hiraditya, llvm-commits, cfe-commits, craig.topper, rnk
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69876
The diagnostic added in D72231 also shows a diagnostic when casting to a
_Bool. This is unwanted. This patch removes the diagnostic for _Bool types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74860
Summary:
As @rsmith notes in https://reviews.llvm.org/D73020#inline-672219
while that is certainly UB land, it may not be actually reachable at runtime, e.g.:
```
template<int N> void *make() {
if ((N & (N-1)) == 0)
return operator new(N, std::align_val_t(N));
else
return operator new(N);
}
void *p = make<7>();
```
and we shouldn't really error-out there.
That being said, i'm not really following the logic here.
Which ones of these cases should remain being an error?
Reviewers: rsmith, erichkeane
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rsmith
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73996
Summary:
Previously any symlinks would be ignored since the directory
traversal doesn't follow them.
With this change we now follow symlinks (via a `stat` call
in order to figure out the target type of the symlink if it
is valid).
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74790
The `-fdeclare-opencl-builtins` option was accepting saturated
conversions for non-integer types, which contradicts both the OpenCL
specification (v2.0 s6.2.3) and Clang's opencl-c.h file.
Use the more accurate location when emitting the location of the
function being called's prototype in diagnostics emitted when calling
a function with an incorrect number of arguments.
In particular, avoids showing a trace of irrelevant macro expansions
for "MY_EXPORT static int AwesomeFunction(int, int);". Fixes PR#23564.
This patch removes the explicit call graph for CUDA/HIP/OpenMP deferred
diagnostics generated during parsing since it is error prone due to
incomplete information about function declarations during parsing. In stead,
this patch does a post-parsing AST traverse and emits deferred diagnostics
based on the use graph implicitly generated during the traverse.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70172
Add fixits for messaging self in MRR or using super, as the intent is
clear, and it turns out people do that a lot more than expected.
Allow for objc_direct_members on main interfaces, it's extremely useful
for internal only classes, and proves to be quite annoying for adoption.
Add some better warnings around properties direct/non-direct clashes (it
was done for methods but properties were a miss).
Add some errors when direct properties are marked @dynamic.
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/58355212
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <phabouzit@apple.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73755
Converting a pointer to an integer whose result cannot represented in the
integer type is undefined behavior is C and prohibited in C++. C++ already
has a diagnostic when casting. This adds a diagnostic for C.
Since this diagnostic uses the range of the conversion it also modifies
int-to-pointer-cast diagnostic to use a range.
Fixes PR8718: No warning on casting between pointer and non-pointer-sized int
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72231
This swaps out the OpenMPDefaultClauseKind enum with a
llvm::omp::DefaultKind enum which is stored in OMPConstants.h.
This should not change any functionality.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74513
This patch implements an almost complete handling of OpenMP
contexts/traits such that we can reuse most of the logic in Flang
through the OMPContext.{h,cpp} in llvm/Frontend/OpenMP.
All but construct SIMD specifiers, e.g., inbranch, and the device ISA
selector are define in `llvm/lib/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPKinds.def`. From
these definitions we generate the enum classes `TraitSet`,
`TraitSelector`, and `TraitProperty` as well as conversion and helper
functions in `llvm/lib/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPContext.{h,cpp}`.
The above enum classes are used in the parser, sema, and the AST
attribute. The latter is not a collection of multiple primitive variant
arguments that contain encodings via numbers and strings but instead a
tree that mirrors the `match` clause (see `struct OpenMPTraitInfo`).
The changes to the parser make it more forgiving when wrong syntax is
read and they also resulted in more specialized diagnostics. The tests
are updated and the core issues are detected as before. Here and
elsewhere this patch tries to be generic, thus we do not distinguish
what selector set, selector, or property is parsed except if they do
behave exceptionally, as for example `user={condition(EXPR)}` does.
The sema logic changed in two ways: First, the OMPDeclareVariantAttr
representation changed, as mentioned above, and the sema was adjusted to
work with the new `OpenMPTraitInfo`. Second, the matching and scoring
logic moved into `OMPContext.{h,cpp}`. It is implemented on a flat
representation of the `match` clause that is not tied to clang.
`OpenMPTraitInfo` provides a method to generate this flat structure (see
`struct VariantMatchInfo`) by computing integer score values and boolean
user conditions from the `clang::Expr` we keep for them.
The OpenMP context is now an explicit object (see `struct OMPContext`).
This is in anticipation of construct traits that need to be tracked. The
OpenMP context, as well as the `VariantMatchInfo`, are basically made up
of a set of active or respectively required traits, e.g., 'host', and an
ordered container of constructs which allows duplication. Matching and
scoring is kept as generic as possible to allow easy extension in the
future.
---
Test changes:
The messages checked in `OpenMP/declare_variant_messages.{c,cpp}` have
been auto generated to match the new warnings and notes of the parser.
The "subset" checks were reversed causing the wrong version to be
picked. The tests have been adjusted to correct this.
We do not print scores if the user did not provide one.
We print spaces to make lists in the `match` clause more legible.
Reviewers: kiranchandramohan, ABataev, RaviNarayanaswamy, gtbercea, grokos, sdmitriev, JonChesterfield, hfinkel, fghanim
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, rampitec, mgorny, hiraditya, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, simoncook, bollu, guansong, dexonsmith, jfb, s.egerton, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71830
Summary:
Zero-parameter K&R definitions specify that the function has no
parameters, but they are still not prototypes, so calling the function
with the wrong number of parameters is just a warning, not an error.
The C11 standard doesn't seem to directly define what a prototype is,
but it can be inferred from 6.9.1p7: "If the declarator includes a
parameter type list, the list also specifies the types of all the
parameters; such a declarator also serves as a function prototype
for later calls to the same function in the same translation unit."
This refers to 6.7.6.3p5: "If, in the declaration “T D1”, D1 has
the form
D(parameter-type-list)
or
D(identifier-list_opt)
[...]". Later in 6.11.7 it also refers only to the parameter-type-list
variant as prototype: "The use of function definitions with separate
parameter identifier and declaration lists (not prototype-format
parameter type and identifier declarators) is an obsolescent feature."
We already correctly treat an empty parameter list as non-prototype
declaration, so we can just take that information.
GCC also warns about this with -Wstrict-prototypes.
This shouldn't affect C++, because there all FunctionType's are
FunctionProtoTypes. I added a simple test for that.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66919
According to OpenMP 5.0, cancel and cancellation point constructs are
supported in taskloop directive. Added support for cancellation in
taskloop, master taskloop and parallel master taskloop.
We previously checked the constraints of instantiated function templates even in cases where
PartialOverloading was true and not all template arguments have been deduced, which caused crashes
in clangd (bug 44714).
We now check if all arguments have been deduced before checking constraints in partial overloading
scenarios.
directive.
According to OpenMP 5.0, The atomic_default_mem_order clause specifies the default memory ordering behavior for atomic constructs that must be provided by an implementation. If the default memory ordering is specified as seq_cst, all atomic constructs on which memory-order-clause is not specified behave as if the seq_cst clause appears. If the default memory ordering is specified as relaxed, all atomic constructs on which memory-order-clause is not specified behave as if the relaxed clause appears.
If the default memory ordering is specified as acq_rel, atomic constructs on which memory-order-clause is not specified behave as if the release clause appears if the atomic write or atomic update operation is specified, as if the acquire clause appears if the atomic read operation is specified, and as if the acq_rel clause appears if the atomic captured update operation is specified.
Added restrictions for atomic directive.
1. If atomic-clause is read then memory-order-clause must not be acq_rel or release.
2. If atomic-clause is write then memory-order-clause must not be
acq_rel or acquire.
3. If atomic-clause is update or not present then memory-order-clause
must not be acq_rel or acquire.
The C++ rules briefly allowed this, but the rule changed nearly 10 years
ago and we never updated our implementation to match. However, we've
warned on this by default for a long time, and no other compiler accepts
(even as an extension).
New intrinisics are implemented for when we need to port SIMD code from other
arhitectures and only load or store portions of MSA registers.
Following intriniscs are added which only load/store element 0 of a vector:
v4i32 __builtin_msa_ldrq_w (const void *, imm_n2048_2044);
v2i64 __builtin_msa_ldr_d (const void *, imm_n4096_4088);
void __builtin_msa_strq_w (v4i32, void *, imm_n2048_2044);
void __builtin_msa_str_d (v2i64, void *, imm_n4096_4088);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73644
1) Fix a regression in llvmorg-11-init-2485-g0e3a4877840 that would
reject some cases where a class name is shadowed by a typedef-name
causing a destructor declaration to be rejected. Prefer a tag type over
a typedef in destructor name lookup.
2) Convert the "type in destructor declaration is a typedef" error to an
error-by-default ExtWarn to allow codebases to turn it off. GCC and MSVC
do not enforce this rule.
Also add extension warnings for the cases that are disallowed by the
current rules for destructor name lookup, refactor and simplify the
lookup code, and improve the diagnostic quality when lookup fails.
The special case we previously supported for converting
p->N::S<int>::~S() from naming a class template into naming a
specialization thereof is subsumed by a more general rule here (which is
also consistent with Clang's historical behavior and that of other
compilers): if we can't find a suitable S in N, also look in N::S<int>.
The extension warnings are off by default, except for a warning when
lookup for p->N::S::~T() looks for T in scope instead of in N (or N::S).
That seems sufficiently heinous to warn on by default, especially since
we can't support it for a dependent nested-name-specifier.
Summary:
Due to a recent (but retroactive) C++ rule change, only sufficiently
C-compatible classes are permitted to be given a typedef name for
linkage purposes. Add an enabled-by-default warning for these cases, and
rephrase our existing error for the case where we encounter the typedef
name for linkage after we've already computed and used a wrong linkage
in terms of the new rule.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74103
Reid Kleckner