This patch improves salvageDebugInfoImpl by allowing it to salvage arithmetic
operations with two or more non-const operands; this includes the GetElementPtr
instruction, and most Binary Operator instructions. These salvages produce
DIArgList locations and are only valid for dbg.values, as currently variadic
DIExpressions must use DW_OP_stack_value. This functionality is also only added
for salvageDebugInfoForDbgValues; other functions that directly call
salvageDebugInfoImpl (such as in ISel or Coroutine frame building) can be
updated in a later patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91722
Recently gc.result has been marked with readnone instead of readonly and
this opens a door for different optimization to duplicate gc.result.
Statepoint lowering is not ready to see several gc.results.
The problem appears when there are gc.results with one located in the same
basic block and another located in other basic block.
In this case we need both export VR and fill local setValue.
Note that this case is not sufficient optimization done before CodeGen.
It is evident that local gc.result dominates all other gc.results and it is handled
by GVN and EarlyCSE.
But anyway, even if IR is not optimal Backend should not crash on a valid IR.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: dantrushin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98393
On riscv32, i64 isn't a legal scalar type but we would like to
support scalable vectors of i64.
This patch introduces a new node that can represent a splat made
of multiple scalar values. I've used this new node to solve the current
crashes we experience when getConstant is used after type legalization.
For RISCV, we are now default expanding SPLAT_VECTOR to SPLAT_VECTOR_PARTS
when needed and then handling the SPLAT_VECTOR_PARTS later during
LegalizeOps. I've remove the special case I previously put in for
ABS for D97991 as the default expansion is now able to succesfully
use getConstant.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98004
If it was decided to relocate derived pointer using the spill its value is
not exported in general case.
When gc.relocate is located in an another block than a statepoint we cannot
get SD for derived value but for spill case it is not required at all.
However implementation of gc.relocate lowering unconditionally request SD value
causing the assert triggering.
The CL fixes this by handling spill case earlier than SD is really required.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: dantrushin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98324
All extractvalues of the same value at the same index will map to
the same register, so even if one specific extractvalue only has
one use, we should not mark it as a trivial kill, as there may be
more extractvalues later.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49467.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98145
This patch updates the various IR passes to correctly handle dbg.values with a
DIArgList location. This patch does not actually allow DIArgLists to be produced
by salvageDebugInfo, and it does not affect any pass after codegen-prepare.
Other than that, it should cover every IR pass.
Most of the changes simply extend code that operated on a single debug value to
operate on the list of debug values in the style of any_of, all_of, for_each,
etc. Instances of setOperand(0, ...) have been replaced with with
replaceVariableLocationOp, which takes the value that is being replaced as an
additional argument. In places where this value isn't readily available, we have
to track the old value through to the point where it gets replaced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88232
This patch completes ISel support for DIArgList dbg.values by allowing
SDDbgValues with multiple location operands to be emitted as DBG_VALUE_LIST
instructions.
The primary change of this patch is refactoring EmitDbgValue by pulling location
operand emission out to the new function AddDbgValueLocationOps, which is used
for both DIArgList and single value dbg.values. Outside of that, the only
behaviour change is that the scheduler has a lambda added, HasUnknownVReg, to
prevent us from attempting to emit a DBG_VALUE_LIST before all of its used VRegs
have become available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88592
This patch introduces a new intrinsic @llvm.experimental.vector.splice
that constructs a vector of the same type as the two input vectors,
based on a immediate where the sign of the immediate distinguishes two
variants. A positive immediate specifies an index into the first vector
and a negative immediate specifies the number of trailing elements to
extract from the first vector.
For example:
@llvm.experimental.vector.splice(<A,B,C,D>, <E,F,G,H>, 1) ==> <B, C, D, E> ; index
@llvm.experimental.vector.splice(<A,B,C,D>, <E,F,G,H>, -3) ==> <B, C, D, E> ; trailing element count
These intrinsics support both fixed and scalable vectors, where the
former is lowered to a shufflevector to maintain existing behaviour,
although while marked as experimental the recommended way to express
this operation for fixed-width vectors is to use shufflevector. For
scalable vectors where it is not possible to express a shufflevector
mask for this operation, a new ISD node has been implemented.
This is one of the named shufflevector intrinsics proposed on the
mailing-list in the RFC at [1].
Patch by Paul Walker and Cullen Rhodes.
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146864.html
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94708
This patch adds partial support in Instruction Selection for dbg.values that use
a DIArgList. This patch does not add support for producing DBG_VALUE_LIST, but
adds the logic for processing DIArgLists within the ISel pass. This change is
largely focused on handleDebugValue and some of the functions that it calls.
Outside of this, salvageDebugInfo and transferDbgValues have been modified to
replace individual operands instead of the entire value; dangling debug info for
variadic debug values is not currently supported (but may be added later).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88589
Similar to the workaround code in ScalarizeVecRes_UnaryOp, ScalarizeVecRes_SETCC
, ScalarizeVecRes_VSELECT, etc.
If we have a case like this:
```
define <1 x half> @func(<1 x float> %x) {
%tmp = fptrunc <1 x float> %x to <1 x half>
ret <1 x half> %tmp
}
```
On AArch64, the <1 x float> is legal. So, this will crash if we call
GetScalarizedVector on it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98208
This patch modifies the class that represents debug values during ISel,
SDDbgValue, to support multiple location operands (to represent a dbg.value that
uses a DIArgList). Part of this class's functionality has been split off into a
new class, SDDbgOperand.
The new class SDDbgOperand represents a single value, corresponding to an SSA
value or MachineOperand in the IR and MIR respectively. Members of SDDbgValue
that were previously related to that specific value (as opposed to the
variable or DIExpression), such as the Kind enum, have been moved to
SDDbgOperand. SDDbgValue now contains an array of SDDbgOperand instead, allowing
it to hold more than one of these values.
All changes outside SDDbgValue are simply updates to use the new interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88585
This patch updates DbgVariableIntrinsics to support use of a DIArgList for the
location operand, resulting in a significant change to its interface. This patch
does not update all IR passes to support multiple location operands in a
dbg.value; the only change is to update the DbgVariableIntrinsic interface and
its uses. All code outside of the intrinsic classes assumes that an intrinsic
will always have exactly one location operand; they will still support
DIArgLists, but only if they contain exactly one Value.
Among other changes, the setOperand and setArgOperand functions in
DbgVariableIntrinsic have been made private. This is to prevent code from
setting the operands of these intrinsics directly, which could easily result in
incorrect/invalid operands being set. This does not prevent these functions from
being called on a debug intrinsic at all, as they can still be called on any
CallInst pointer; it is assumed that any code directly setting the operands on a
generic call instruction is doing so safely. The intention for making these
functions private is to prevent DIArgLists from being overwritten by code that's
naively trying to replace one of the Values it points to, and also to fail fast
if a DbgVariableIntrinsic is updated to use a DIArgList without a valid
corresponding DIExpression.
The result of ISD::USUBSAT will never be larger than the LHS. We
can use this to put a bound on the number of leading zeros.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98133
Implement the promotion rule for SELECT_CC nodes by upcasting all the parameters and downcasting the result.
The AArch64 target makes use of this rule and, since it was not implemented, in some cases the instruction selector would hit an assertion upon encountering the illegal node.
This patch requires D97840, the included test cases hit both problems.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97859
I'm not sure this would catch all such issues, but it would catch some.
The problem for PR49393 was that we were holding a reference to a node that
wasn't connect edto the DAG across a function that could delete unused nodes. In
this particular case we managed to try to use the deleted node while it was in
the deleted state before its memory got recycled.
It could also happen that we delete the node, something allocates a new node
which recycles the memory. Then we try to use the reference we were holding and
it is now a completely different node with different valid opcode. This patch
would not catch that.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97969
For binary or ternary ops we call getNegatedExpression multiple
times and then compare costs. While we're doing this we need to
hold a node from the first call across the second call, but its
not yet attached to the DAG. Its possible the second call creates
an identical node and then decides it didn't need it so will try
to delete it if it has no uses. This can cause a reference to the
node we're holding further up the call stack to become invalidated.
To prevent this, we can use a HandleSDNode to artifically give
the node a use without connecting it to the DAG.
I've used a std::list of HandleSDNodes so we can create handles
only when we have a node to hold. HandleSDNode does not have
default constructor and cannot be copied or moved.
Fixes PR49393.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97914
explicitly emitting retainRV or claimRV calls in the IR
This reapplies ed4718eccb, which was reverted
because it was causing a miscompile. The bug that was causing the miscompile
has been fixed in 75805dce5f.
Original commit message:
Background:
This fixes a longstanding problem where llvm breaks ARC's autorelease
optimization (see the link below) by separating calls from the marker
instructions or retainRV/claimRV calls. The backend changes are in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92569.
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#arc-runtime-objc-autoreleasereturnvalue
What this patch does to fix the problem:
- The front-end adds operand bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall" to calls,
which indicates the call is implicitly followed by a marker
instruction and an implicit retainRV/claimRV call that consumes the
call result. In addition, it emits a call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which consumes the call result, to
prevent the middle-end passes from changing the return type of the
called function. This is currently done only when the target is arm64
and the optimization level is higher than -O0.
- ARC optimizer temporarily emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the calls
with the operand bundle in the IR and removes the inserted calls after
processing the function.
- ARC contract pass emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the call with the
operand bundle. It doesn't remove the operand bundle on the call since
the backend needs it to emit the marker instruction. The retainRV and
claimRV calls are emitted late in the pipeline to prevent optimization
passes from transforming the IR in a way that makes it harder for the
ARC middle-end passes to figure out the def-use relationship between
the call and the retainRV/claimRV calls (which is the cause of
PR31925).
- The function inliner removes an autoreleaseRV call in the callee if
nothing in the callee prevents it from being paired up with the
retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. It then inserts a release call if
claimRV is attached to the call since autoreleaseRV+claimRV is
equivalent to a release. If it cannot find an autoreleaseRV call, it
tries to transfer the operand bundle to a function call in the callee.
This is important since the ARC optimizer can remove the autoreleaseRV
returning the callee result, which makes it impossible to pair it up
with the retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. If that fails, it simply
emits a retain call in the IR if retainRV is attached to the call and
does nothing if claimRV is attached to it.
- SCCP refrains from replacing the return value of a call with a
constant value if the call has the operand bundle. This ensures the
call always has at least one user (the call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use).
- This patch also fixes a bug in replaceUsesOfNonProtoConstant where
multiple operand bundles of the same kind were being added to a call.
Future work:
- Use the operand bundle on x86-64.
- Fix the auto upgrader to convert call+retainRV/claimRV pairs into
calls with the operand bundles.
rdar://71443534
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808
This caused miscompiles of Chromium tests for iOS due clobbering of live
registers. See discussion on the code review for details.
> Background:
>
> This fixes a longstanding problem where llvm breaks ARC's autorelease
> optimization (see the link below) by separating calls from the marker
> instructions or retainRV/claimRV calls. The backend changes are in
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D92569.
>
> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#arc-runtime-objc-autoreleasereturnvalue
>
> What this patch does to fix the problem:
>
> - The front-end adds operand bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall" to calls,
> which indicates the call is implicitly followed by a marker
> instruction and an implicit retainRV/claimRV call that consumes the
> call result. In addition, it emits a call to
> @llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which consumes the call result, to
> prevent the middle-end passes from changing the return type of the
> called function. This is currently done only when the target is arm64
> and the optimization level is higher than -O0.
>
> - ARC optimizer temporarily emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the calls
> with the operand bundle in the IR and removes the inserted calls after
> processing the function.
>
> - ARC contract pass emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the call with the
> operand bundle. It doesn't remove the operand bundle on the call since
> the backend needs it to emit the marker instruction. The retainRV and
> claimRV calls are emitted late in the pipeline to prevent optimization
> passes from transforming the IR in a way that makes it harder for the
> ARC middle-end passes to figure out the def-use relationship between
> the call and the retainRV/claimRV calls (which is the cause of
> PR31925).
>
> - The function inliner removes an autoreleaseRV call in the callee if
> nothing in the callee prevents it from being paired up with the
> retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. It then inserts a release call if
> claimRV is attached to the call since autoreleaseRV+claimRV is
> equivalent to a release. If it cannot find an autoreleaseRV call, it
> tries to transfer the operand bundle to a function call in the callee.
> This is important since the ARC optimizer can remove the autoreleaseRV
> returning the callee result, which makes it impossible to pair it up
> with the retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. If that fails, it simply
> emits a retain call in the IR if retainRV is attached to the call and
> does nothing if claimRV is attached to it.
>
> - SCCP refrains from replacing the return value of a call with a
> constant value if the call has the operand bundle. This ensures the
> call always has at least one user (the call to
> @llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use).
>
> - This patch also fixes a bug in replaceUsesOfNonProtoConstant where
> multiple operand bundles of the same kind were being added to a call.
>
> Future work:
>
> - Use the operand bundle on x86-64.
>
> - Fix the auto upgrader to convert call+retainRV/claimRV pairs into
> calls with the operand bundles.
>
> rdar://71443534
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808
This reverts commit ed4718eccb.
This function isn't exercised in lit tests today today according to
the code coverage report. But will be after the tests in D97543 and
D97559.
Posting this patch to help a crash that Fraser hit.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97582
This prepares codegen for a change that will remove the identical
folds from IR because they are not poison-safe. See
D93065 / D97360
for details.
We already generically support scalar types, and there are various
target-specific transforms that overlap the vector folds. For example,
x86 recognizes the and patterns, but not or. We can end up with 1
extra instruction there, but I think that is still preferred over the
blendv alternative that loads a constant vector.
If this is not optimal, then it should be fixed with a later transform
(this change is not expected to result in any regressions because
InstCombine currently does the same thing).
Removing custom code and supporting undefs in constant-pattern-matching
can be follow-up changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97730
The code previously used two BUILD_PAIRs to concatenate the two UMULO
results with 0s in the lower bits to match original VT. Then it created
an ADD and a UADDO with the original bit width. Each of those operations
need to be expanded since they have illegal types.
Since we put 0s in the lower bits before the ADD, the lower half of the
ADD result will be 0. So the lower half of the UADDO result is
solely determined by the other operand. Since the UADDO need to
be split in half, we don't really needd an operation for the lower
bits. Unfortunately, we don't see that in type legalization and end up
creating something more complicated and DAG combine or
lowering aren't always able to recover it.
This patch directly generates the narrower ADD and UADDO to avoid
needing to legalize them. Now only the MUL is done on the original
type.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97440
This patch addresses issues arising from the fact that the index type
used for subvector insertion/extraction is inconsistent between the
intrinsics and SDNodes. The intrinsic forms require i64 whereas the
SDNodes use the type returned by SelectionDAG::getVectorIdxTy.
Rather than update the intrinsic definitions to use an overloaded index
type, this patch fixes the issue by transforming the index to the
correct type as required. Any loss of index bits going from i64 to a
smaller type is unexpected, and will be caught by an assertion in
SelectionDAG::getVectorIdxConstant.
The patch also updates the documentation for INSERT_SUBVECTOR and adds
an assertion to its creation to bring it in line with EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR.
This necessitated changes to AArch64 which was using i64 for
EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR but i32 for INSERT_SUBVECTOR. Only one test changed
its codegen after updating the backend accordingly.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97459
Currently dead gc value mentioned in the deopt section are not listed in gc section
and so are processed separately.
With this CL all deopt gc values are considered as base pointers and processed in the
same way as other gc values.
The fact that deopt gc pointer is a base pointer was used all the time but
it is explicitly documented here by putting the value in SI.Base.
The idea of the patch comes from Philip Reames.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97554
If the type of the deopt operand has an illegal type and we want to use
register for it then it needs to be legalized.
This is not supported currently by legalizer and it is not actually clear how to
legalize this type of values.
Instead we just spill such values and use spill slot location in statepoint.
Originally tests were created by Philip Reames.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97541
Peeking through AND is only valid if the input to both shifts is
the same. If the inputs are different, then the original pattern
ORs the two values when the masked shift amount is 0. This is ok
if the values are the same since the OR would be a NOP which is
why its ok for rotate.
Fixes PR49365 and reverts PR34641
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97637
Even if the first computeKnownBits call doesn't have any zero
bits it is possible the other operand has bitwidth-1 leading zero.
In that case overflow is still impossible. So always call computeKnownBits
for both operands.
D97247 added the reverse mapping from unwind destination to their
source, but it had a critical bug; sources can be multiple, because
multiple BBs can have a single BB as their unwind destination.
This changes `WasmEHFuncInfo::getUnwindSrc` to `getUnwindSrcs` and makes
it return a vector rather than a single BB. It does not return the const
reference to the existing vector but creates a new vector because
`WasmEHFuncInfo` stores not `BasicBlock*` or `MachineBasicBlock*` but
`PointerUnion` of them. Also I hoped to unify those methods for
`BasicBlock` and `MachineBasicBlock` into one using templates to reduce
duplication, but failed because various usages require `BasicBlock*` to
be `const` but it's hard to make it `const` for `MachineBasicBlock`
usages.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514.
(More precisely, fixes
https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514#issuecomment-784708744)
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97583
Using ComputeNumSignBits or computeKnownBits we might be able
to determine that overflow is impossible.
This especially helps after type legalization if the type was
promoted from a type with half the bits or more. Type legalization
conservatively creates a promoted smulo/umulo and an overflow
check for the promoted bits. The overflow from the promoted
smulo/umulo is ORed with the result of the promoted bits
overflow check. Proving that the promoted smulo/umulo can never
overflow will leave us with just the promoted bits overflow check.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97160
When calling SelectionDAG::getNode() to create an ADD or SUB
of two vectors with i1 element types we can canonicalise this
to use XOR instead, where 1+1 is treated as wrapping around
to 0 and 0-1 wraps to 1.
I've added the following tests for SVE targets:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-pred-arith.ll
and modified some X86 tests to reflect the much simpler codegen
required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97276
Rather than converting 3 signbits to bools and comparing them,
we can do bitwise logic on the whole vector and convert the
resulting sign bit to a bool at the end.
This is still a different algorithm than what we do in LegalizeDAG
through expandSADDOSSUBO. That algorithm needs to know that the
RHS of SSUBO is > 0, but that's costly when the type is split.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97325
We know the input is going to be expanded as well, so we should
just ask for the already expanded operands. Otherwise we create
nodes that are just going to need to be legalized.
This CL is not big but contains changes that span multiple analyses and
passes. This description is very long because it tries to explain basics
on what each pass/analysis does and why we need this change on top of
that. Please feel free to skip parts that are not necessary for your
understanding.
---
`WasmEHFuncInfo` contains the mapping of <EH pad, the EH pad's next
unwind destination>. The value (unwind dest) here is where an exception
should end up when it is not caught by the key (EH pad). We record this
info in WasmEHPrepare to fix catch mismatches, because the CFG itself
does not have this info. A CFG only contains BBs and
predecessor-successor relationship between them, but in `WasmEHFuncInfo`
the unwind destination BB is not necessarily a successor or the key EH
pad BB. Their relationship can be intuitively explained by this C++ code
snippet:
```
try {
try {
foo();
} catch (int) { // EH pad
...
}
} catch (...) { // unwind destination
}
```
So when `foo()` throws, it goes to `catch (int)` first. But if it is not
caught by it, it ends up in the next unwind destination `catch (...)`.
This unwind destination is what you see in `catchswitch`'s
`unwind label %bb` part.
---
`WebAssemblyExceptionInfo` groups exceptions so that they can be sorted
continuously together in CFGSort, as we do for loops. What this analysis
does is very simple: it creates a single `WebAssemblyException` per EH
pad, and all BBs that are dominated by that EH pad are included in this
exception. We also identify subexception relationship in this way: if
EHPad A domiantes EHPad B, EHPad B's exception is a subexception of
EHPad A's exception.
This simple rule turns out to be incorrect in some cases. In
`WasmEHFuncInfo`, if EHPad A's unwind destination is EHPad B, it means
semantically EHPad B should not be included in EHPad A's exception,
because it does not make sense to rethrow/delegate to an inner scope.
This is what happened in CFGStackify as a result of this:
```
try
try
catch
... <- %dest_bb is among here!
end
delegate %dest_bb
```
So this patch adds a phase in `WebAssemblyExceptionInfo::recalculate` to
make sure excptions' unwind destinations are not subexceptions of
their unwind sources in `WasmEHFuncInfo`.
But this alone does not prevent `dest_bb` in the example above from
being sorted within the inner `catch`'s exception, even if its exception
is not a subexception of that `catch`'s exception anymore, because of
how CFGSort works, which will be explained below.
---
CFGSort places BBs within the same `SortRegion` (loop or exception)
continuously together so they can be demarcated with `loop`-`end_loop`
or `catch`-`end_try` in CFGStackify.
`SortRegion` is a wrapper for one of `MachineLoop` or
`WebAssemblyException`. `SortRegionInfo` already does some complicated
things because there discrepancies between those two data structures.
`WebAssemblyException` is what we control, and it is defined as an EH
pad as its header and BBs dominated by the header as its BBs (with a
newly added exception of unwind destinations explained in the previous
paragraph). But `MachineLoop` is an LLVM data structure and uses the
standard loop detection algorithm. So by the algorithm, BBs that are 1.
dominated by the loop header and 2. have a path back to its header.
Because of the second condition, many BBs that are dominated by the loop
header are not included in the loop. So BBs that contain `return` or
branches to outside of the loop are not technically included in
`MachineLoop`, but they can be sorted together with the loop with no
problem.
Maybe to relax the condition, in CFGSort, when we are in a `SortRegion`
we allow sorting of not only BBs that belong to the current innermost
region but also BBs that are by the current region header.
(This was written this way from the first version written by Dan, when
only loops existed.) But now, we have cases in exceptions when EHPad B
is the unwind destination for EHPad A, even if EHPad B is dominated by
EHPad A it should not be included in EHPad A's exception, and should not
be sorted within EHPad A.
One way to make things work, at least correctly, is change `dominates`
condition to `contains` condition for `SortRegion` when sorting BBs, but
this will change compilation results for existing non-EH code and I
can't be sure it will not degrade performance or code size. I think it
will degrade performance because it will force many BBs dominated by a
loop, which don't have the path back to the header, to be placed after
the loop and it will likely to create more branches and blocks.
So this does a little hacky check when adding BBs to `Preferred` list:
(`Preferred` list is a ready list. CFGSort maintains ready list in two
priority queues: `Preferred` and `Ready`. I'm not very sure why, but it
was written that way from the beginning. BBs are first added to
`Preferred` list and then some of them are pushed to `Ready` list, so
here we only need to guard condition for `Preferred` list.)
When adding a BB to `Preferred` list, we check if that BB is an unwind
destination of another BB. To do this, this adds the reverse mapping,
`UnwindDestToSrc`, and getter methods to `WasmEHFuncInfo`. And if the BB
is an unwind destination, it checks if the current stack of regions
(`Entries`) contains its source BB by traversing the stack backwards. If
we find its unwind source in there, we add the BB to its `Deferred`
list, to make sure that unwind destination BB is added to `Preferred`
list only after that region with the unwind source BB is sorted and
popped from the stack.
---
This does not contain a new test that crashes because of this bug, but
this fix changes the result for one of existing test case. This test
case didn't crash because it fortunately didn't contain `delegate` to
the incorrectly placed unwind destination BB.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97247
This code creates 3 setccs that need to be expanded. It was
creating a sign bit test as setge X, 0 which is non-canonical.
Canonical would be setgt X, -1. This misses the special case in
IntegerExpandSetCCOperands for sign bit tests that assumes
canonical form. If we don't hit this special case we end up
with a multipart setcc instead of just checking the sign of
the high part.
To fix this I've reversed the polarity of all of the setccs to
setlt X, 0 which is canonical. The rest of the logic should
still work. This seems to produce better code on RISCV which
lacks a setgt instruction.
This probably still isn't the best code sequence we could use here.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97181
This renames variable and method names in `WasmEHFuncInfo` class to be
simpler and clearer. For example, unwind destinations are EH pads by
definition so it doesn't necessarily need to be included in every method
name. Also I am planning to add the reverse mapping in a later CL,
something like `UnwindDestToSrc`, so this renaming will make meanings
clearer.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97173
This also removes a pattern from RISCV that is no longer needed
since the sexti32 on the LHS of the srem in the pattern implies
the result is sign extended so the sign_extend_inreg should be
removed in DAG combine now.
Reviewed By: luismarques, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97133
This patch handles usubsat patterns hidden through zext/trunc and uses the getTruncatedUSUBSAT helper to determine if the USUBSAT can be correctly performed in the truncated form:
zext(x) >= y ? x - trunc(y) : 0 --> usubsat(x,trunc(umin(y,SatLimit)))
zext(x) > y ? x - trunc(y) : 0 --> usubsat(x,trunc(umin(y,SatLimit)))
Based on original examples:
void foo(unsigned short *p, int max, int n) {
int i;
unsigned m;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
m = *--p;
*p = (unsigned short)(m >= max ? m-max : 0);
}
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25987
If extload is legal, following transform
(zext (select c, load1, load2)) -> (select c, zextload1, zextload2)
can save one ext instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95086
Adjust generateFMAsInMachineCombiner to return false if SVE is present
in order to combine fmul+fadd into fma. Also add new pseudo instructions
so as to select the most appropriate of FMLA/FMAD depending on register
allocation.
Depends on D96599
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96424
CheckInteger uses an int64_t encoded using a variable width encoding
that is optimized for encoding a number with a lot of leading zeros.
Negative numbers have no leading zeros so use the largest encoding
requiring 9 bytes.
I believe its most like we want to check for positive and negative
numbers near 0. -1 is quite common due to its use in the 'not'
idiom.
To optimize for this, we can borrow an idea from the bitcode format
and move the sign bit to bit 0 with the magnitude stored in the
upper bits. This will drastically increase the number of leading
zeros for small magnitudes. Then we can run this value through
VBR encoding.
This gives a small reduction in the table size on all in tree
targets except VE where size increased by about 300 bytes due
to intrinsic ids now requiring 3 bytes instead of 2. Since the
intrinsic enum space is shared by all targets this an unfortunate
consquence of where VE is currently located in the range.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96317
Fold shuffle(bop(shuffle(x,y),shuffle(z,w)),bop(shuffle(a,b),shuffle(c,d))) -> bop(shuffle(x,y),shuffle(z,w)),bop(shuffle(a,b),shuffle(c,d))
Attempt to fold from a shuffle of a pair of binops to a binop of shuffles, as long as one/both of the binop sources are also shuffles that can be merged with the outer shuffle. This should guarantee that we remove one binop without introducing any additional shuffles.
Technically there's potential for a merged shuffle's lowering to be poorer than the original shuffle, but it could also be better, and I'm not seeing any regressions as long as we keep the 'don't merge splats' rule already present in MergeInnerShuffle.
This expands and generalizes an existing X86 combine and attempts to merge either of each binop's sources (with an on-the-fly commutation of the shuffle mask) - we couldn't do that in the x86 version as it had to stay in a form that DAGCombine's MergeInnerShuffle would still recognise.
Fixes issue raised by @saugustine in rG5aa8f4c0843a where we were failing to replace null shuffle operands from MergeInnerShuffle to UNDEFs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96345
This reverts commit 5dfba562dd.
That commit causes an assertion failure with the following repro:
typedef long b __attribute__((__vector_size__(16)));
b *d;
b e;
b __attribute__((__always_inline__)) c(b h, b i) {
return (__attribute__((__vector_size__(8 * sizeof(short)))) short)h + i;
}
j() {
b k, l, m, n, o[6], p, q;
m = d[5];
b r = m;
b s = f(r, 8);
q = s;
l = d[1];
p = l;
t(q);
n = c(m, l);
o[1] = c(s, f(p, 8));
k = __builtin_shufflevector(n, o[1], 0, 2);
e = __builtin_ia32_psrlwi128(k, j);
}
./bin/clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-grtev4-linux-gnu -emit-obj -O1 -std=c99 test.c
Similar to D96622, we're better off just promoting uaddsat(x,y) -> umin(add(x,y),c) instead of trying to perform a shifted uaddsat.
I initially tried to just use shifted promotion in cases where we didn't have a legal/custom umin - but we don't appear to have any targets that have uaddsat but not umin, so imo we're better off always using the umin and avoid an untested shifted uaddsat code path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96767
fde2466171 added support for
scalable vectors to matchUnaryPredicate by handling SPLAT_VECTOR in
addition to BUILD_VECTOR. This was used to enabled UDIV/SDIV/UREM/SREM
by constant expansion in BuildUDIV/BuildSDIV in TargetLowering.cpp
The caller there expects to call getBuildVector from the match factors.
This leads to a crash right now if there is a SPLAT_VECTOR of
fixed vectors since the number of vectors won't match the number
of elements.
To fix this, this patch updates the callers to check the opcode
instead of whether the type is fixed or scalable. This assumes
that only 3 opcodes are handled by matchUnaryPredicate so
I've added an assertion to the final else to check that opcode.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96174
Fold shuffle(bop(shuffle(x,y),shuffle(z,w)),bop(shuffle(a,b),shuffle(c,d))) -> bop(shuffle(x,y),shuffle(z,w)),bop(shuffle(a,b),shuffle(c,d))
Attempt to fold from a shuffle of a pair of binops to a binop of shuffles, as long as one/both of the binop sources are also shuffles that can be merged with the outer shuffle. This should guarantee that we remove one binop without introducing any additional shuffles.
Technically there's potential for a merged shuffle's lowering to be poorer than the original shuffle, but it could also be better, and I'm not seeing any regressions as long as we keep the 'don't merge splats' rule already present in MergeInnerShuffle.
This expands and generalizes an existing X86 combine and attempts to merge either of each binop's sources (with an on-the-fly commutation of the shuffle mask) - we couldn't do that in the x86 version as it had to stay in a form that DAGCombine's MergeInnerShuffle would still recognise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96345
If we're going to end up expanding anyway, we should do it early
so we don't create extra operations to handle the bytes added by
promotion.
Simlilar was done for BSWAP previously.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96681
This patch adds a new intrinsic experimental.vector.reduce that takes a single
vector and returns a vector of matching type but with the original lane order
reversed. For example:
```
vector.reverse(<A,B,C,D>) ==> <D,C,B,A>
```
The new intrinsic supports fixed and scalable vectors types.
The fixed-width vector relies on shufflevector to maintain existing behaviour.
Scalable vector uses the new ISD node - VECTOR_REVERSE.
This new intrinsic is one of the named shufflevector intrinsics proposed on the
mailing-list in the RFC at [1].
Patch by Paul Walker (@paulwalker-arm).
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146864.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94883
In the future Windows will enable Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET aka shadow stacks). To protect the path where the context is updated during exception handling, the binary is required to enumerate valid unwind entrypoints in a dedicated section which is validated when the context is being set during exception handling.
This change allows llvm to generate the section that contains the appropriate symbol references in the form expected by the msvc linker.
This feature is enabled through a new module flag, ehcontguard, which was modelled on the cfguard flag.
The change includes a test that when the module flag is enabled the section is correctly generated.
The set of exception continuation information includes returns from exceptional control flow (catchret in llvm).
In order to collect catchret we:
1) Includes an additional flag on machine basic blocks to indicate that the given block is the target of a catchret operation,
2) Introduces a new machine function pass to insert and collect symbols at the start of each block, and
3) Combines these targets with the other EHCont targets that were already being collected.
Change originally authored by Daniel Frampton <dframpto@microsoft.com>
For more details, see MSVC documentation for `/guard:ehcont`
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/guard-enable-eh-continuation-metadata
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94835
As discussed on D96413, as long as the promoted bits of the args are zero we can use the basic ISD::USUBSAT pattern directly, without the shifting like we do for other ops.
I think something similar should be possible for ISD::UADDSAT as well, which I'll look at later.
Also, create a ISD::USUBSAT node directly - this will be expanded back by the legalizer later on if necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96622
We lost this in D56387/rG69bc0990a9181e6eb86228276d2f59435a7fae67 - where I got the src/dst bitwidths mixed up and assumed getValidShiftAmountConstant would catch it.
Patch by @craig.topper - confirmed by @Carrot that it fixes PR49162
Begin transitioning the X86 vector code to recognise sub(umax(a,b) ,b) or sub(a,umin(a,b)) USUBSAT patterns to make it more generic and available to all targets.
This initial patch just moves the basic umin/umax patterns to DAG, removing some vector-only checks on the way - these are some of the patterns that the legalizer will try to expand back to so we can be reasonably relaxed about matching these pre-legalization.
We can handle the trunc(sub(..))) variants as well, which helps with patterns where we were promoting to a wider type to detect overflow/saturation.
The remaining x86 code requires some cleanup first - some of it isn't actually tested etc. I also need to resurrect D25987.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96413
explicitly emitting retainRV or claimRV calls in the IR
Background:
This fixes a longstanding problem where llvm breaks ARC's autorelease
optimization (see the link below) by separating calls from the marker
instructions or retainRV/claimRV calls. The backend changes are in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92569.
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#arc-runtime-objc-autoreleasereturnvalue
What this patch does to fix the problem:
- The front-end adds operand bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall" to calls,
which indicates the call is implicitly followed by a marker
instruction and an implicit retainRV/claimRV call that consumes the
call result. In addition, it emits a call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which consumes the call result, to
prevent the middle-end passes from changing the return type of the
called function. This is currently done only when the target is arm64
and the optimization level is higher than -O0.
- ARC optimizer temporarily emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the calls
with the operand bundle in the IR and removes the inserted calls after
processing the function.
- ARC contract pass emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the call with the
operand bundle. It doesn't remove the operand bundle on the call since
the backend needs it to emit the marker instruction. The retainRV and
claimRV calls are emitted late in the pipeline to prevent optimization
passes from transforming the IR in a way that makes it harder for the
ARC middle-end passes to figure out the def-use relationship between
the call and the retainRV/claimRV calls (which is the cause of
PR31925).
- The function inliner removes an autoreleaseRV call in the callee if
nothing in the callee prevents it from being paired up with the
retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. It then inserts a release call if
claimRV is attached to the call since autoreleaseRV+claimRV is
equivalent to a release. If it cannot find an autoreleaseRV call, it
tries to transfer the operand bundle to a function call in the callee.
This is important since the ARC optimizer can remove the autoreleaseRV
returning the callee result, which makes it impossible to pair it up
with the retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. If that fails, it simply
emits a retain call in the IR if retainRV is attached to the call and
does nothing if claimRV is attached to it.
- SCCP refrains from replacing the return value of a call with a
constant value if the call has the operand bundle. This ensures the
call always has at least one user (the call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use).
- This patch also fixes a bug in replaceUsesOfNonProtoConstant where
multiple operand bundles of the same kind were being added to a call.
Future work:
- Use the operand bundle on x86-64.
- Fix the auto upgrader to convert call+retainRV/claimRV pairs into
calls with the operand bundles.
rdar://71443534
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808
If we wait until the type is legalized, we'll lose information
about the orginal type and need to use larger magic constants.
This gets especially bad on RISCV64 where i64 is the only legal
type.
I've limited this to simple scalar types so it only works for
i8/i16/i32 which are most likely to occur. For more odd types
we might want to do a small promotion to a type where MULH is legal
instead.
Unfortunately, this does prevent some urem/srem+seteq matching since
that still require legal types.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96210
As for SETCC, use a less expensive condition code when generating
STRICT_FSETCC if the node is known not to have Nan.
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91972
This commit moves a line in SelectionDAGBuilder::handleDebugValue to
avoid implicitly casting a TypeSize object to an unsigned earlier than
necessary. It was possible that we bail out of the loop before the value
is ever used, which means we could create a superfluous TypeSize
warning.
Reviewed By: DavidTruby
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96423
The IR/MIR pseudo probe intrinsics don't get materialized into real machine instructions and therefore they don't incur runtime cost directly. However, they come with indirect cost by blocking certain optimizations. Some of the blocking are intentional (such as blocking code merge) for better counts quality while the others are accidental. This change unblocks perf-critical optimizations that do not affect counts quality. They include:
1. IR InstCombine, sinking load operation to shorten lifetimes.
2. MIR LiveRangeShrink, similar to #1
3. MIR TwoAddressInstructionPass, i.e, opeq transform
4. MIR function argument copy elision
5. IR stack protection. (though not perf-critical but nice to have).
Reviewed By: wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95982
Avoid doing the following combine for vector types:
```
copysign(x, fp_extend(y)) -> copysign(x, y)
copysign(x, fp_round(y)) -> copysign(x, y)
```
That combine seemed to impede the selection of vector instruction and cause
a mess in some circumstances.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96037
As of commit 284f2bffc9, the DAG Combiner gets rid of the masking of the
input to this node if the mask only keeps the bottom 16 bits. This is because
the underlying library function does not use the high order bits. However, on
PowerPC's ELFv2 ABI, it is the caller that is responsible for clearing the bits
from the register. Therefore, the library implementation of __gnu_h2f_ieee will
return an incorrect result if the bits aren't cleared.
This combine is desired for ARM (and possibly other targets) so this patch adds
a query to Target Lowering to check if this zeroing needs to be kept.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49092
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96283
As for SETCC, use a less expensive condition code when generating
STRICT_FSETCC if the node is known not to have Nan.
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91972
Make sure scalable property is preserved by using getVectorElementCount().
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95967
emitting retainRV or claimRV calls in the IR
This reapplies 3fe3946d9a without the
changes made to lib/IR/AutoUpgrade.cpp, which was violating layering.
Original commit message:
Background:
This patch makes changes to the front-end and middle-end that are
needed to fix a longstanding problem where llvm breaks ARC's autorelease
optimization (see the link below) by separating calls from the marker
instructions or retainRV/claimRV calls. The backend changes are in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92569.
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#arc-runtime-objc-autoreleasereturnvalue
What this patch does to fix the problem:
- The front-end adds operand bundle "clang.arc.rv" to calls, which
indicates the call is implicitly followed by a marker instruction and
an implicit retainRV/claimRV call that consumes the call result. In
addition, it emits a call to @llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which
consumes the call result, to prevent the middle-end passes from changing
the return type of the called function. This is currently done only when
the target is arm64 and the optimization level is higher than -O0.
- ARC optimizer temporarily emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the calls
with the operand bundle in the IR and removes the inserted calls after
processing the function.
- ARC contract pass emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the call with the
operand bundle. It doesn't remove the operand bundle on the call since
the backend needs it to emit the marker instruction. The retainRV and
claimRV calls are emitted late in the pipeline to prevent optimization
passes from transforming the IR in a way that makes it harder for the
ARC middle-end passes to figure out the def-use relationship between
the call and the retainRV/claimRV calls (which is the cause of
PR31925).
- The function inliner removes an autoreleaseRV call in the callee if
nothing in the callee prevents it from being paired up with the
retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. It then inserts a release call if
the call is annotated with claimRV since autoreleaseRV+claimRV is
equivalent to a release. If it cannot find an autoreleaseRV call, it
tries to transfer the operand bundle to a function call in the callee.
This is important since ARC optimizer can remove the autoreleaseRV
returning the callee result, which makes it impossible to pair it up
with the retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. If that fails, it simply
emits a retain call in the IR if the implicit call is a call to
retainRV and does nothing if it's a call to claimRV.
Future work:
- Use the operand bundle on x86-64.
- Fix the auto upgrader to convert call+retainRV/claimRV pairs into
calls annotated with the operand bundles.
rdar://71443534
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808
emitting retainRV or claimRV calls in the IR
Background:
This patch makes changes to the front-end and middle-end that are
needed to fix a longstanding problem where llvm breaks ARC's autorelease
optimization (see the link below) by separating calls from the marker
instructions or retainRV/claimRV calls. The backend changes are in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92569.
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#arc-runtime-objc-autoreleasereturnvalue
What this patch does to fix the problem:
- The front-end adds operand bundle "clang.arc.rv" to calls, which
indicates the call is implicitly followed by a marker instruction and
an implicit retainRV/claimRV call that consumes the call result. In
addition, it emits a call to @llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which
consumes the call result, to prevent the middle-end passes from changing
the return type of the called function. This is currently done only when
the target is arm64 and the optimization level is higher than -O0.
- ARC optimizer temporarily emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the calls
with the operand bundle in the IR and removes the inserted calls after
processing the function.
- ARC contract pass emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the call with the
operand bundle. It doesn't remove the operand bundle on the call since
the backend needs it to emit the marker instruction. The retainRV and
claimRV calls are emitted late in the pipeline to prevent optimization
passes from transforming the IR in a way that makes it harder for the
ARC middle-end passes to figure out the def-use relationship between
the call and the retainRV/claimRV calls (which is the cause of
PR31925).
- The function inliner removes an autoreleaseRV call in the callee if
nothing in the callee prevents it from being paired up with the
retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. It then inserts a release call if
the call is annotated with claimRV since autoreleaseRV+claimRV is
equivalent to a release. If it cannot find an autoreleaseRV call, it
tries to transfer the operand bundle to a function call in the callee.
This is important since ARC optimizer can remove the autoreleaseRV
returning the callee result, which makes it impossible to pair it up
with the retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. If that fails, it simply
emits a retain call in the IR if the implicit call is a call to
retainRV and does nothing if it's a call to claimRV.
Future work:
- Use the operand bundle on x86-64.
- Fix the auto upgrader to convert call+retainRV/claimRV pairs into
calls annotated with the operand bundles.
rdar://71443534
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808
If sext_inreg is supported, we will turn this into sext_inreg. That
will then remove it if there are enough sign bits. But if sext_inreg
isn't supported, we can still remove the shift pair based on sign
bits.
Split from D95890.
The AArch64 DAG combine added by D90945 & D91433 extends the index
of a scalable masked gather or scatter to i32 if necessary.
This patch removes the combine and instead adds shouldExtendGSIndex, which
is used by visitMaskedGather/Scatter in SelectionDAGBuilder to query whether
the index should be extended before calling getMaskedGather/Scatter.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94525
gbtozers