D18885 emitted 5 bytes for call *foo@tlsdesc(%rax). It should use the
2-byte form instead and let R_X86_64_TLSDESC_CALL apply to the beginning
of the call instruction.
The 2-byte form was deliberately chosen to make ->LE and ->IE relaxation work:
0: 48 8d 05 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%rip),%rax # 7 <.text+0x7>
3: R_X86_64_GOTPC32_TLSDESC a-0x4
7: ff 10 callq *(%rax)
7: R_X86_64_TLSDESC_CALL a
=>
0: 48 c7 c0 fc ff ff ff mov $0xfffffffffffffffc,%rax
7: 66 90 xchg %ax,%ax
Also change the symbol type to STT_TLS when VK_TLSCALL or VK_TLSDESC is
seen.
Reviewed By: compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62512
llvm-svn: 361910
These can be used to force the encoding used for instructions.
{vex2} will fail if the instruction is not VEX encoded, but otherwise won't do anything since we prefer vex2 when possible. Might need to skip use of the _REV MOV instructions for this too, but I haven't done that yet.
{vex3} will force the instruction to use the 3 byte VEX encoding or fail if there is no VEX form.
{evex} will force the instruction to use the EVEX version or fail if there is no EVEX version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59266
llvm-svn: 358029
Summary:
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes translation switches for converting between Jcc instructions and condition codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate. We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, courbet, gchatelet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, eraman, hiraditya, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60228
llvm-svn: 357802
Summary:
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes translation switches for converting between SETcc instructions and condition codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate. We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60138
llvm-svn: 357801
Summary:
Reorder the condition code enum to match their encodings. Move it to MC layer so it can be used by the scheduler models.
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes
translation switches for converting between CMOV instructions and condition
codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate.
We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the
asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked
IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
This does complicate the scheduler models a little since we can't assign the
A and BE instructions to a separate class now.
I plan to make similar changes for SETcc and Jcc.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri, andreadb, courbet
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: gchatelet, hiraditya, kristina, lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60041
llvm-svn: 357800
This should allow llvm-exegesis to intelligently constrain the rounding mode.
The mask in the encoder shouldn't be necessary any more. We used to allow codegen to use 8-11 for rounding mode and the assembler would use 0-3 to mean the same thing so we masked here and in the printer. Codegen now matches the assembler and the printer was updated, but I forgot to update the encoder.
llvm-svn: 357419
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
(%bp) can't be encoded without a displacement. The encoding is instead used for displacement alone. So a 1 byte displacement of 0 must be used. But if there is an index register we can encode without a displacement.
llvm-svn: 335379
Summary:
This is similar to D46319 (ARM). x86-64 psABI p40 gives an example:
leaq _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE(%rip), %r15 # GOTPC32 reloc
GNU as creates R_X86_64_GOTPC32. However, MC currently emits R_X86_64_PC32.
Reviewers: javed.absar, echristo
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, peter.smith, grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47507
llvm-svn: 334515
X86 Supports Indirect Branch Tracking (IBT) as part of Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (CET).
IBT instruments ENDBR instructions used to specify valid targets of indirect call / jmp.
The `nocf_check` attribute has two roles in the context of X86 IBT technology:
1. Appertains to a function - do not add ENDBR instruction at the beginning of the function.
2. Appertains to a function pointer - do not track the target function of this pointer by adding nocf_check prefix to the indirect-call instruction.
This patch implements `nocf_check` context for Indirect Branch Tracking.
It also auto generates `nocf_check` prefixes before indirect branchs to jump tables that are guarded by range checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41879
llvm-svn: 327767
For instructions like call foo and jmp foo patch changes
relocation produced from R_X86_64_PC32 to R_X86_64_PLT32.
Relocation can be used as a marker for 32-bit PC-relative branches.
Linker will reduce PLT32 relocation to PC32 if function is defined locally.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43383
llvm-svn: 325569
In the rare case where the input contains rip-relative addressing with
immediate displacements, *and* the instruction ends with an immediate,
we encode the instruction in the wrong way:
movl $12345678, 0x400(%rdi) // all good, no rip-relative addr
movl %eax, 0x400(%rip) // all good, no immediate at the end of the instruction
movl $12345678, 0x400(%rip) // fails, encodes address as 0x3fc(%rip)
Offset is a label:
movl $12345678, foo(%rip)
we want to account for the size of the immediate (in this case,
$12345678, 4 bytes).
Offset is an immediate:
movl $12345678, 0x400(%rip)
we should not account for the size of the immediate, assuming the
immediate offset is what the user wanted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43050
llvm-svn: 324772
There was a top level "let Predicates =" in the .td file that was overriding the Requires on each instruction.
I've added an assert to the code emitter to catch more cases like this. I'm sure this isn't the only place where the right predicates aren't being applied. This assert already found that we don't block btq/btsq/btrq in 32-bit mode.
llvm-svn: 320830
Summary:
Intel documentation shows the memory operand as the first operand. But we currently treat it as the second operand. Conceptually the order doesn't matter since it doesn't write memory. We have aliases to parse with the operands in either order and the isel matching is commutable.
For the register®ister form order does matter for the assembly parser. PR22995 was previously filed and fixed by changing the register®ister form from MRMSrcReg to MRMDestReg to match gas. Ideally the memory form should match by using MRMDestMem.
I believe this supercedes D38025 which was trying to switch the register®ister form back to pre-PR22995.
Reviewers: aymanmus, RKSimon, zvi
Reviewed By: aymanmus
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38120
llvm-svn: 314639
We were producing R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX for invalid instructions and
sometimes producing R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX instead of
R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX.
llvm-svn: 271118
For some instructions the register is not the last operand and the immediate handling had to detect this and hardcode the index to find it. It also required CurOp to be pointing at the last operand handled in the Form switch whereas for any instruction it would be pointing at the next operand.
Now we just capture the value in the Form switch when we know exactly where it is and the CurOp pointer can behave normally.
llvm-svn: 262462
Summary:
Enables eip-based addressing, e.g.,
lea constant(%eip), %rax
lea constant(%eip), %eax
in MC, (used for the x32 ABI). EIP-base addressing is also valid in x86_64,
it is left enabled for that architecture as well.
Patch by João Porto
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16581
llvm-svn: 259528
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first several times this was committed (e.g. r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
Apparently the reason for most failures was both clang and gcc's inability to deal with large numbers (> 10K) of bitset constructor calls in tablegen-generated initializers of instruction info tables.
This should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 238192
Fangrui Song